top of page
Search

Conscious Capitalism Explained


Conscious Capitalism extends investing beyond the financial statements and incorporates additional factors such as ethics, moral, governance, and environmental or social risks. There are multiple approaches with varying objectives, which makes it confusing for many people exploring the space. This article seeks to resolve this confusion by describing the primary Conscious Capitalism strategies, which are illustrated in the diagram below.

ESG Integration

Exclusion Screening

Norms-Based Screening

Engagement

Best-In-Class

Impact

Sustainability Themed


Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Integration

ESG Integration involves identifying an entity’s key ESG risks/factors and analysing how the entity manages those risks/factors. This can be assessed on an absolute basis or relative to the entity’s peers. Companies with clear and appropriate ESG policies and structures, which can also demonstrate behaviour aligned with those policies and structures, have strong ESG credentials.


Boliden (BOL.SE), a Swedish metals and mining company has strong ESG credentials because it has clear commitments and programs to address climate change, water stress, and biodiversity impacts; maintains a zero-fatality record for the five years through 2021, has a fully independent and gender diverse board, and doesn’t have controlling shareholders or special capital structures*.


Peloton Interactive (PTON.US), a US manufacturer of home exercise equipment, is assessed to have poor ESG credentials due to lapses in product safety and quality while its facilities appear to lack certifications from internationally recognized quality standards. In addition, there is no evidence of a dedicated supply chain code of conduct or monitoring programs. Furthermore, there is evidence of misalignment of interests between PTON’s executives and minority shareholders including early vesting provisions for share-based awards, special share classes with unequal voting rights, and shareholders have no rights to call a special meeting*.


We purposely selected a company involved in metal and mining, an activity sometimes shunned by some Conscious Capitalists, to demonstrate strong ESG credentials and a company involved in health and fitness, an activity often sought by Conscious Capitalists, to illustrate weak ESG credentials. This demonstrates that ESG credentials are not determined by how an entity makes money but is rather its adherence to and compliance with ESG factors.


Key point - ESG Integration focuses on an entity’s attitude towards ESG considerations, given its industry, rather than the entity’s core operating activities.


* Source - MSCI ESGManager


Exclusion Screening

Exclusions (aka ‘negative’) Screening involves avoiding entities that generate revenue from an activity that is contrary to an investor’s moral/ethical values. A materiality requirement is normally applied, which means the investor will avoid entities that generate a proportion of revenue from a banned activity that is above a threshold. For example, an investor might avoid companies that generate more than 10% of their revenue from selling tobacco products, while another might have a threshold of 0%, meaning that investor will exclude companies that generate any revenue from tobacco products.


Examples of activities that are regularly part of exclusion lists include: alcohol, animal cruelty, casinos, deforestation, pornography, for profit prisons, manufacturing or distribution of weapons, mining and exploration of fossil fuels and uranium, and tobacco manufacturing.

Selection of the banned activities should primarily reflect the investor’s personal values, which can be controversial as few people share all the same values. For example, Pella excludes companies that make any type of weapon, because we believe all weapons are unnecessary, which is not a view shared by everyone. Pella does not exclude all mining companies, as we believe some commodities (e.g. copper) are necessary for a functional world, which is also not a view shared by everyone.


Key point – Exclusion Screening involves avoiding investing in entities who generate more revenue from an activity than an investor’s personal values/morals allow.


Norms-Based Screening

Norms-Based Screening involves excluding entities that have demonstrated extremely bad behaviour, regardless of the industry they are involved in. Investors often refer to the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) or the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises to define good or bad behaviour. However, as with Exclusion Screening, the interpretation of those documents and the ultimate definition of good or bad behaviour is based on the investor’s values.


For example, Pella applied a Norms-Based Screen to exit Visa (V.US) in 2022. Visa’s primary activity is payment processing, which is not an excluded activity, and its ESG credentials are well above average, but it did something that ran contrary to Pella’s values. In essence, there is strong evidence that Visa knowingly processed payments for a company that was alleged to be providing access to child pornography. For a more complete discussion please refer to Pella’s blog, ‘Visa, Porn, and our Red Line’.


Key point - Norms-Based Screening is based on an entity’s behaviour.


Engagement

Engagement involves executing shareholder rights and fiduciary duties guided by ESG considerations. At a minimum, engagement involves participating in all shareholder votes with the votes aligned with ESG considerations. Other forms of engagement include communicating desired ESG behaviours to management/directors and filing shareholder proposals.


As Pella seeks to invest in companies with strong ESG credentials, our approach to Engagement is generally cooperative and we have witnessed satisfactory outcomes from this approach. On the other hand, more activist shareholders seeking to amend a company’s ESG approach often resort to a more aggressive approach. In addition to participating in all shareholder votes, some examples of Pella’s approach to Engagement include writing to all companies in our fund to become signatories of the UN Global Compact, writing to Marsh & McLennan (MMC.US) Board of Directors to request they conduct a study of their exposure to the fossil fuel sector, and requesting retailers to disclose their revenue from selling tobacco products. In contrast, activists such as Elliott Investment Management and Carl Icahn enter proxy battles to make changes to Boards of companies that demonstrate poor corporate governance over an extended period.


Key point - Engagement relates to an investor’s behaviour to contribute to the positive ESG credentials of its investments.


Best-In-Class (BIC)

BIC targets investing in companies that have superior ESG credentials relative to their industry peers. It is essentially an offshoot of the ESG Integration strategy, which is compared in the table below.

Best-In-Class

ESG Integration

Measured

Relative to industry peers

Absolute or relative to industry peers

Implementation

Seek entities with best ESG credentials

Avoid entities with bad ESG credentials

Key point – BIC seeks to invest in the entities with the best ESG credentials within their industry.


Impact

The Impact strategy seeks to invest in entities whose core revenue-generating activities deliver positive social and environmental impacts. These positive impacts are often defined by an investor’s values, but it is common for investors to refer to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to define positive impact.


It can be argued that most portfolios hold an investment(s) in some entities that have a positive social or environmental impact. The delineation between Impact funds and others is that Impact funds should have most, if not all, its investments in entities with positive social and environmental impacts.


Key point – the Impact strategy is concerned with creating a portfolio consisting exclusively of entities whose core activities deliver positive environmental or social outcomes.


Sustainability-Themed

Sustainability-Themed involves targeting investments in entities that address a specific social or environmental issue. This approach can be considered a sub-category of the Impact strategy in that it targets a specific impact theme. By virtue of its focus on specific themes, this strategy is typically narrowly focused. Examples of these themes include: renewable electricity, female-led companies, health and wellbeing, sustainable forestry, low carbon, clean transport.


Key point – Sustainability-Themed focuses on investments that address a specific social or environmental issue.


Conclusion

There are multiple Conscious Capitalism strategies. Some of the strategies focus on an entity’s attitude towards ESG factors (ESG Integration, Best-In-Class), others focus on the entity’s core revenue generating activities (Exclusion Screening, Impact, Sustainability-Themed), one focuses on an entity’s behaviour (Norms-Based Screening), and one focuses on the investor’s rather than the investment’s behaviour (Engagement). All these strategies have their merits, which is why Pella chooses to apply several of them, the combination of which we define as Responsible Investing. The combination of Pella’s multi-faceted responsible investment strategies and our financial rigour in seeking out investments forms the bedrock of our quest as Conscious Capitalists to sustainably grow our clients’ capital.

47 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page